![]() So then on my blog I have to make up more terms for mechanics (like " micro-concepts"), which I'm sure other people have done too, and that's why some terms are so ambiguous. Regularly, I feel like there should be more terms for things that happen in writing that don't have names, and the terms we have should be more specific. Note 2: Again, could be interesting for an unreliable narrator.Sometimes I'm strolling through the writing world, and I'm like what the what is with the writing industry's terms? There are "terms" that mean different things to different writers. Whom,” so there’s a lot of variation that you could do with it. Note 1: Like the “reader,” the inner monologue is another very common for the “to Interior monologue, the convention being that we follow the character’s thoughts in their Definition: Overheard thoughts are generally of two kinds, of which the more common is Like this, I’m pretty familiar with how they work. Note 2: Since we worked a lot with these in class, and some of the workshop stories are Note 1: It only mentions this being used as a diary in the book, but I think it could also beĪ person narrative story or a story written to yourself. Definition: An even greater intimacy is implied if the character’s story is as secret as aĭiary or as private as a mind, addressed to the self and not intended to be heard byĪnyone inside or outside the action. Note 2: I also agree with the book that there is a lot of variation in the “who speaks”Ĭategory, as well as the scenarios in which this “to whom” would take place. Omniscient (to the reader) being who is withholding a lot of information from the readerĪnd telling a story to another person while the reader listens. Note 1: I’m going to read one of these when the book comes out next year. Which case we as readers “overhear” it the teller of the tale does not acknowledge usĮven by implication. Definition: On the other hand, the story may be told to another character, or characters, in Note 2: This also works well with a lot of the different “who speaks.” Variation in the things that you can do with it. Definition: Most fiction is addressed to a literary convention, “the reader.” - Note 1: Definitely a very basic address, but it works really well and there’s a lot of Note 2: I hadn’t heard about the making “I” into an “us,” I think that’s an interesting idea. How that differs from the narrator in the omniscient perspective. Note 1: I’m wondering since it said if a story has a narrator that it’s told in first person Point of View Notes Kalan Weber - Definition: A story is told in the first person when one of its characters relates the story’sĪction and events. Note 2: Interesting that even though it’s “you,” it’s still an “I” story. The reader more, but I think that would just pull me out of the story. Note 1: It mentions that some stories use this point of view to depict trauma and engage Specific characteristics and reactions, and thereby-assuming that you go along with herĬharacterization-pulls you deeper and more intimately into the story. Definition: Here the author makes you, the reader, into the character by assigning you The author would have to make up for the lack of internal This point of view kind of reminds me of the first part of the virtualĪuthor reading event about Judaculla Rock - Note 2: This seems very impersonal and like it would be difficult to make the readerĮngaged with the characters. Note 1: The Hills Like White Elephants example was nice, and helped with Might be observed by a human witness: to the senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and Definition: As an objective author, you restrict your knowledge to the external facts that Multiple people’s perspective because then some characters know things that other’sĭon’t. I think it’s interesting to do this perspective in a novel with Note 2: I personally like this the best because it puts you into the same boat as theĬharacter you’re following. I used it in mine and it made writing and reading it a lot easier. Note 1: The textbook did note that this was a good idea for writing a short story, which Iĭefinitely agree with. Some, but not all, of the omniscient author’s freedom. ![]() Definition: The limited omniscient viewpoint is one in which the author may move with They don’t have to work to understand them, there would have to be more of other factors ![]() Note 2: Since I feel like this would also distance the readers from the characters because Unreliable one, maybe able to tell the story in an omniscient way, but have it be biased or Note 1: I think this would be interesting if the omniscient narrator ended up being an Definition: The omniscient author has total knowledge and tells us directly what we are
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |